CA Homeowners Sue Top Insurers, Allege ‘Collusion’ Left Thousands of Wildfire Victims Underinsured

Dual suits charge insurers ‘colluded’ to ‘eliminate competition’ and push high-risk policies to state’s insurer of last resort.

Katie Powers
Written byKatie Powers
Photo of an Insurify author
Katie PowersSenior Editor
  • Licensed auto and home insurance agent

  • 3+ years experience in insurance and personal finance editing

  • NPN: 20564519

Katie uses her knowledge and expertise as a licensed property and casualty agent in Massachusetts to help readers understand the complexities of insurance shopping.

Featured in

media logomedia logo
Chris Schafer
Edited byChris Schafer
Chris Schafer
Chris SchaferDeputy Managing Editor, News and Marketing Content
  • 15+ years in content creation

  • 7+ years in business and financial services content

Chris is a seasoned writer/editor with past experience across myriad industries, including insurance, SAS, finance, Medicare, logistics, marketing/advertising, and many more.

Featured in

media logomedia logomedia logomedia logo
John Leach
Reviewed byJohn Leach
Photo of an Insurify author
John LeachSenior Insurance Copy Editor
  • Licensed property and casualty insurance agent

  • 8+ years editing experience

  • NPN: 20461358

John leads Insurify’s copy desk, helping ensure the accuracy and readability of Insurify’s content. He’s a licensed agent specializing in home and car insurance topics.

Featured in

media logo

Published | Reading time: 2 minutes

Advertiser Disclosure

At Insurify, our goal is to help customers compare insurance products and find the best policy for them. We strive to provide open, honest, and unbiased information about the insurance products and services we review. Our hard-working team of data analysts, insurance experts, insurance agents, editors and writers, has put in thousands of hours of research to create the content found on our site.

We do receive compensation when a sale or referral occurs from many of the insurance providers and marketing partners on our site. That may impact which products we display and where they appear on our site. But it does not influence our meticulously researched editorial content, what we write about, or any reviews or recommendations we may make. We do not guarantee favorable reviews or any coverage at all in exchange for compensation.

Why you can trust Insurify: Comparing accurate insurance quotes should never put you at risk of spam. We earn an agent commission only if you buy a policy based on our quotes. Our editorial team follows a rigorous set of editorial standards and operates independently from our insurance partners. Learn more.

Share

Victims of the January Los Angeles area wildfires are suing the top 25 home insurance companies in the state, alleging that the insurers colluded to force high-risk policies out of the private insurance market and into the state’s FAIR (Fair Access to Insurance Requirements) Plan.

By canceling existing policies and refusing to write new ones in areas with high wildfire risks, insurers forced homeowners to pay higher premiums for FAIR policies that provided inadequate coverage, the suit charges. As a result, many affected homeowners suffered “massive uncovered losses from January’s wildfire disaster,” according to a statement by one of the companies that filed suit on the homeowners’ behalf.

On April 18, law firms Larson and Shernoff Bidart Echeverria filed two similar class-action lawsuits. The lawsuits allege violations of California’s antitrust and unfair competition laws and seek compensatory damages for plaintiffs.

Defendants in the class-action lawsuits include California’s largest home insurers: State Farm, Farmers, CSAA, Liberty Mutual, Mercury, Allstate, USAA, Travelers, American Family, Berkshire Hathaway (GEICO), and more.

Plaintiffs paid more but got less protection, suits argue

The lawsuits outline an alleged conspiracy, beginning in 2023, by the defendant insurance companies, which had been selling residential and commercial property insurance in the state for years.

One of the lawsuits — Todd Ferrier et al. v. State Farm Group et al. — claims the insurance companies, which had previously competed in the insurance market, “agreed, combined, colluded and conspired to eliminate competition between them related to their offering of property insurance coverage products, including fire insurance.”

It alleges that the defendants agreed to stop selling and renewing property insurance policies in specific areas, including the Pacific Palisades, Malibu, and Altadena. As a result, homeowners who previously held coverage through the defendant insurers had no other option but to seek coverage through the state’s insurer of last resort, the FAIR Plan.

The FAIR Plan is designed to be an option for residents who can’t find coverage elsewhere. The plan provides limited coverage with a cap of $3 million, yet policies are typically more expensive than private insurance options.

Outlining the same complaints, the second lawsuit — Anthony Canzoneri v. State Farm Group et al. — claims “the net result of this scheme was that these homeowners were each unjustly forced to pay thousands of extra dollars for deficient policies, while Defendants collectively reaped a windfall worth billions of dollars.”

Wildfires kindled collusion lawsuits

The lawsuits follow the January 2025 wildfires in Los Angeles County, which damaged or destroyed thousands of homes. The Palisades Fire alone burned nearly 24,000 acres, destroying 6,837 properties and damaging another 973 structures.

“Those who lost their homes have been shocked to find themselves systemically and dramatically underinsured under FAIR Plan policies, despite having paid artificially inflated premiums,” according to a claim made in the second lawsuit.

Since 2020, the number of FAIR Plan policyholders has significantly increased from around 200,000 to about 560,000 in March 2025. The FAIR Plan will likely have to pay out around $4 billion in claims following the January fires, according to reporting from the Los Angeles Times.

What’s next? Requests from plaintiffs

Plaintiffs in the Todd Ferrier et al. v. State Farm Group et al. lawsuit are seeking “three times the damages each have sustained, and attorney’s fees, costs, and interest as provided by statute.” The Anthony Canzoneri v. State Farm Group et al. lawsuit seeks a similar outcome for members of the class action.

Insurers, thus far, have not commented on the lawsuits.

Plaintiffs in both lawsuits have requested trial by jury.

Katie Powers
Katie PowersSenior Editor

Katie Powers is an insurance writer at Insurify with a producer’s license for property and casualty insurance in New York and expertise in personal finance and auto insurance topics. She strives to help consumers make better financial decisions. Prior to joining Insurify, she completed her undergraduate and graduate degrees at Emerson College. Her work has been published in St. Louis Magazine, the Boston Globe, and elsewhere. Connect with Katie on LinkedIn.

Chris Schafer
Edited byChris SchaferDeputy Managing Editor, News and Marketing Content
Chris Schafer
Chris SchaferDeputy Managing Editor, News and Marketing Content
  • 15+ years in content creation

  • 7+ years in business and financial services content

Chris is a seasoned writer/editor with past experience across myriad industries, including insurance, SAS, finance, Medicare, logistics, marketing/advertising, and many more.

Featured in

media logomedia logomedia logomedia logo
John Leach
Reviewed byJohn LeachSenior Insurance Copy Editor
Photo of an Insurify author
John LeachSenior Insurance Copy Editor
  • Licensed property and casualty insurance agent

  • 8+ years editing experience

  • NPN: 20461358

John leads Insurify’s copy desk, helping ensure the accuracy and readability of Insurify’s content. He’s a licensed agent specializing in home and car insurance topics.

Featured in

media logo