Too Much Tech Can Be a Turnoff for Drivers, New Study Finds
J.D. Power report evaluates driver satisfaction, while scrutiny grows around risks of driver-controlled tech.
Published | Reading time: 3 minutes
Published | Reading time: 3 minutes
More isn’t necessarily better when it comes to vehicle tech, a new J.D. Power study reveals. In fact, drivers favor technology that simplifies the driving process over higher-tech features that can increase behind-the-wheel complexity.
The tech feature that drivers most favored in the study was smart ignition technology. Passenger screens were the least satisfactory tech feature, the study found.
As more automakers incorporate touchscreen technology into more models, multiple global studies are spotlighting the potential risks of motorists interacting with touchscreens while driving. And while many insurers offer discounts for safety technology — like lane-departure warnings and cross-traffic alerts — rating models generally don’t account for the impact of touchscreens on driver performance and safety.
Having a touchscreen in your car may affect the cost of physical damage coverage, but “as for increased liability exposure, it hasn’t come up yet,” said Buddy Parkhurst, a digital insurance agent with insurance-comparison platform Insurify.
Smart ignition technology that turns vehicles on or off based on driver activity is the most satisfying tech feature for drivers, according to the J.D. Power 2026 U.S. Tech Experience Index (TXI) Study. The feature is also among the tech bells and whistles that cause the fewest problems.
Conversely, drivers are most dissatisfied with passenger screens, which are common in premium vehicles, the auto data and intelligence firm reported. More than a third (35%) of drivers who own vehicles with passenger screens said they’ve never even tried to use the feature.
The takeaway for auto manufacturers, said Doron Hikry, J.D. Power’s director of customer success, is “more automation and additional screens don’t necessarily translate into a better experience.”
“For automakers, the opportunity is to prioritize technology that makes driving simpler, not more complicated,” Hikry said in a press release.
J.D. Powers’ report doesn’t make a judgment call on how tech, especially touchscreens, affects driver safety. But multiple global studies point to dashboard touchscreens being increasingly problematic.
A joint University of Washington and Toyota Research Institute study found that when test drivers interacted with screens in behind-the-wheel simulations, both their driving and their screen efficiency suffered. Drivers drifted in their lane 42% more often when using touchscreens and were 58% slower and less accurate in their screen interactions.
And when researchers added in memory tests that mimicked the mental demand of traffic conditions and other distractions, drivers’ tendency to reach for controls before looking at them jumped from 63% to 71%, the study found.
University of Toronto researchers compiled findings from 73 different studies on vehicle touchscreens.
“Touchscreens,” they wrote, “tend to perform worse than physical/voice control with some exceptions.”
The researchers concluded that touchscreens negatively affected drivers’ performance, visual attention, ability to perform secondary tasks while driving, and how safe they felt behind the wheel.
While individual driving records have the greatest effect on car insurance premiums, vehicles also influence pricing. Generally, the more expensive a vehicle is to repair or replace, the more it will cost to insure. That’s why new and high-value vehicles tend to come with higher auto insurance rates.
Many insurers discount rates for vehicles with technology features that can improve driver and passenger safety, like collision avoidance and lane-departure warnings. Anything that helps drivers avoid a crash can also reduce their likelihood of filing a claim, saving money for their insurer in the long run.
So far, Parkhurst noted, agents haven’t seen signs that insurers are considering touchscreens as potential liability risks. If anything, he said, they could affect full-coverage premiums.
“Some vehicles now have screens that run the entire length of the dash. Replacing a screen or unit of that size will be costly,” Parkhurst said. “This will impact the price of your physical damage coverage — your comprehensive and collision — without a doubt.”
At Insurify, our goal is to help customers compare insurance products and find the best policy for them. We strive to provide open, honest, and unbiased information about the insurance products and services we review. Our hard-working team of data analysts, insurance experts, insurance agents, editors and writers, has put in thousands of hours of research to create the content found on our site.
We do receive compensation when a sale or referral occurs from many of the insurance providers and marketing partners on our site. That may impact which products we display and where they appear on our site. But it does not influence our meticulously researched editorial content, what we write about, or any reviews or recommendations we may make. We do not guarantee favorable reviews or any coverage at all in exchange for compensation.